Cem Ilkel vs Julius Tverijonas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs J. Tverijonas

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
31
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
580
C. Rank
869
144
Best Rank
776
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Julius Tverijonas
LTU
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
31
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'2" (188 cm)
580
C. Rank
869
144
Best Rank
776
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Tverijonas
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Julius Tverijonas winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Julius Tverijonas was at the Turkey F22, 01-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ilkel | 2 |
| Tverijonas | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Turkey F22(06-01-15)
Cem Ilkel
7
6
Julius Tverijonas
5
2
(R1) Turkey F18(05-06-13)
Cem Ilkel
6
Julius Tverijonas
6
C. Ilkel vs J. Tverijonas H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.52% (438-337) | Career Total W/L | 55.33% (83-67) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Ilkel vs J. Tverijonas Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 58.57% of points on their second serve, while Julius Tverijonas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 49.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Julius Tverijonas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 63.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Julius Tverijonas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Julius Tverijonas winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Julius Tverijonas has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 32/18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Julius Tverijonas has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Julius Tverijonas being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Julius Tverijonas winning 0.
- The last match between Cem Ilkel and Julius Tverijonas was at the Turkey F22, 01-06-2015, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 423.45 while Julius Tverijonas has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Julius Tverijonas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 11.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Julius Tverijonas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cem Ilkel vs Julius Tverijonas Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ilkel vs J. Tverijonas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 19 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ilkel 58%, Tverijonas 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ilkel 52%, Tverijonas 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Ilkel 61%, Tverijonas 0%.
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
J. Tverijonas Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||

C. Ilkel vs J. Tverijonas Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (438/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.33% (83/67) |
| 54.63% (979/813) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.47% (177/154) |
| 51.54% (8791/8267) | Games Win/Loss | 51.80% (1558/1450) |
| 61.41% (288/181) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.00% (32/18) |
| 44.53% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (42/36) |
| 54.76% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2865 | Aces Total | 175 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 152 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 560.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.37 |
| 58% (24152/41308) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3231/5032) |
| 70% (16999/24152) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2021/3231) |
| 51% (8757/17156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (807/1801) |
| 40% (1622/4023) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (223/523) |
| 39% (16247/41803) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2056/4984) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 17.86% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.23% (176/161) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 66.39% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 57.64% (83/61) |
| 56% (426/756) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (78/142) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 53% (147/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (18/34) |
| 56% (130/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 85% (424/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (84/71) |
| 14% (424/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (84/13) |
| 21% (350/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (64/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:40 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction06:20 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:10 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Ignacio Buse vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
17:50
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico